Home / What changed
Edition 1 to edition 2 draft
What changed in the ISO 27555 draft
Eleven held changes between the public sample of the 2021 edition and the public sample of the DIS. Each entry gives the old position, the new position and what it means for a deletion procedure. The comparison is of the public samples, not the licensed full texts.
The stage trail
Where the draft stands, and what comes next
| Stage | Step | Date | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.99 | New project approved | 2025-09-26 | Recorded on the ISO page |
| 30.99 | CD approved for registration as DIS | 2025-09-26 | Recorded on the ISO page |
| 40.00 | DIS registered | 2026-03-26 | Recorded on the ISO page |
| 40.20 | DIS ballot initiated: 12 weeks | 2026-05-29 | Recorded on the ISO page and the public sample |
| 40.60 | Close of voting | 2026-08-22 | Recorded on the ISO page; current stage |
| 40.92 | Full report circulated: DIS referred back to TC or SC | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| 40.93 | Full report circulated: decision for new DIS ballot | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| 40.99 | Full report circulated: DIS approved for registration as FDIS | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| 50.00 | Final text received or FDIS registered for formal approval | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| 50.20 | Proof sent to secretariat or FDIS ballot initiated: 8 weeks | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| 50.60 | Close of voting. Proof returned by secretariat | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| 60.00 | International Standard under publication | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| 60.60 | International Standard published | Not recorded | Not recorded; 2027-09-16 is a planning estimate |
The record stands at stage 40.60, close of voting, on 22 August 2026. The planning date used on this site is 16 September 2027, about fifteen months after the close of the ballot. It is an estimate and not an ISO date. The public checkpoints still to come are 40.92 or 40.93 if the DIS is referred back, 40.99 if it is approved for registration as an FDIS, 50.00 for the final text and 60.60 for publication.
No certification transition. The ISO record names no certification scheme for this document. It is guidance for policies and procedures, not a management system standard. There is no accreditation deadline and no transition audit. The date that matters is the one your organisation sets for its own policy update, and the date your auditor or customer expects the published replacement to be cited.
The change ledger
Eleven held changes
| Change | Was | Now | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| The contents keeps ten clauses and 45 subclauses structure | Edition 1 had ten clauses and 45 subclauses across about 25 pages. | The DIS keeps the same ten top level clauses and the same subclause count across 27 pages. | The revision is not a rebuild of the framework. A team can map its existing clause references across, then re-read the text for the wording changes. |
| Clause 1 widens the exclusion to deletion processes text | The scope excluded the dependability, security and fitness of the deletion tools. | The DIS excludes the same test for the deletion process as well as for the tool. | The operating process, not only the tool, is outside the draft. An organisation still has to run it, and clause 9 is where the draft returns to implementation. |
| The introduction adds individual requests text | The framework set out deletion applied in the same way across the organisation. | The framework adds the handling of a request from one person to delete, or to pause a deletion. | A policy that has no route for one person to ask for deletion or for a hold has a visible gap in the DIS. |
| The notes to deletion move the technical detail out term | The definition notes described bit patterns, reconstruction effort and a risk based choice of method, and pointed to de-identification guidance. | The notes keep the synonyms and point the reader to clause 5.1, the end of clause 9.1 and the bibliography for mechanisms and their security. | Read clauses 5 and 9 together with the definition. The technical explanation has moved, so a policy that quotes only clause 3 will lose it. |
| Two storage terms are added term | The abbreviation list covered discs, tapes and common file formats. | The DIS adds solid state disk and write once read many storage. | The medium inventory must include solid state and write once media. The deletion route for each is different. |
| Clause 5.1 describes the mechanism families text | Clause 5.1 set the policy and procedure sequence without naming mechanism families. | The DIS describes overwriting, device commands, encryption with key destruction and physical destruction, and points to the bibliography for detail. | There is now a plain list to check an estate against. It is still not a specification of any one method. |
| Clause 5.3 adds notes on clusters as containers text | The clause described naming and the case where one record sits in several clusters. | The DIS adds notes that clusters are logical containers, that a rule generally stays stable until purpose or law changes, and that a change of purpose can move a data object. | A cluster is a purpose container, not a system container. A system migration does not by itself change the rule. |
| Clause 5.4.2 talks about the deletion process text | The regular deletion period was the retention period plus the maximum time for deletion work. | The DIS expresses the outer limit in terms of the deletion process and the maximum acceptable time for it. | The operational routine is now part of the period arithmetic. If the process is slow, the period is longer and that must be written down. |
| Clause 7.4.3 changes its subject heading | The heading was the need to extend the period of active use. | The heading covers postponement when a record is moved into a different cluster. | The DIS treats a move between clusters as the reason for the delay. A policy that still uses the old heading has not caught up with the structure. |
| Clause 9 gains the most space structure | Clause 9 ran from about page 16 to page 21 of 25. | Clause 9 runs from about page 17 to page 25 of 27, with the individual request clause at the end. | Implementation and the individual request route are where the revision expects work. Budget the update there first. |
| The edition in force is still the 2021 text status | ISO/IEC 27555:2021 is published and stands at stage 90.92, to be revised. | The DIS is a draft in the enquiry phase. It is not an International Standard and may change before publication. | Do not cite the DIS as the current standard in a policy or an audit response. Cite the published edition, and plan for the replacement. |
What did not change
The ten clauses, the 45 subclauses, the ten defined terms and the single normative reference all remain. A team can map its existing clause references across and then re-read the text for the wording changes above. That is a materially smaller job than a rebuild, and it is the first thing to tell a steering group.
If you want the clause-level work product, the kit turns the change map and the 55 headings into a register and a dated plan. The watch emails when the stage, the date or the public sample moves.